Case study

Strengthening fraud screening controls through a targeted tuning and optimisation programme

01298_82A1284_BeyondFS_10th-July-2026_Copyright-Richard-Boll_Josie
Associate DirectorJosie Seymour
Associate DirectorJosie Seymour

Following an audit finding, a Japanese corporate bank engaged BeyondFS to review and overhaul its fraud screening environment. Its fraud rules had not been tuned for several years, documentation around controls was limited, and whitelist and blacklist controls had grown in an ad hoc way.

BeyondFS was brought in to assess the full rule set, identify real control gaps and implement practical improvements that would stand up to scrutiny, over a six-month programme.

  • Industry segment

    Japanese Corporate Bank

  • Function

    Fraud / Screening Controls

  • Core capabilities

    Fraud rule tuning, Controls optimisation, Whitelist and blacklist governance

Key outcomes delivered
  • Improved screening coverage: A review and optimisation of c.129 fraud screening rules, with weak rules removed or challenged.
  • A new evidence base for tuning: A productive case library of known fraud events, built from scratch and matched to transaction data.
  • A new rule for the biggest risk: Analysis showed invoice and payment redirection fraud was the dominant typology, leading to a new rule to detect it.
  • Stronger whitelist and blacklist governance: A more consistent approach, with annual governance and MLRO sign-off, improving control, efficiency and customer experience.

Approach

Rebuilding the evidence base, then tuning against it

BeyondFS carried out a structured review and overhaul of the bank's fraud screening environment. We assessed c.129 rules, separating those that were genuinely tunable from those that were ineffective, obsolete or poorly designed.

To tune with confidence, the bank needed evidence. We built a productive case library from scratch, drawing together known attempted and successful frauds from across the business, then matched those events back to transaction data to see whether they had been detected, which rules had fired and where coverage gaps remained.

Key elements of the approach included:

  • A rule-by-rule assessment of c.129 fraud screening rules to separate tunable rules from ineffective, obsolete or poorly designed ones
  • A productive case library built from front office, operations, customer services, compliance and second line investigations
  • Transaction-level analysis that identified invoice and payment redirection fraud as the dominant typology, and led to the design of a new rule to detect it
  • A review and rationalisation of whitelist and blacklist controls, with a more consistent approach across both
  • Annual governance and MLRO sign-off to keep controls sustainable over time

Throughout, we worked closely with operational investigators so that rule changes and new logic reflected real payment behaviour and practical alert handling, not just theoretical design.

Results

rule review

0

fraud screening rules assessed

programme

0 months

to a clearer more defensible screening environment

evidence base

0

business areas feeding the new case library

Hubspot blog post featured images-3
Outcome

A clearer, more defensible fraud screening environment

After a six-month programme, the bank has a clearer, more defensible fraud screening environment and a much stronger understanding of the fraud risks it actually faces. Weak rules were removed or challenged, control coverage improved, and tuning decisions now rest on evidence rather than ageing logic and limited documentation.

The redesign of whitelist and blacklist controls strengthened protection against known fraudulent parties, while reducing unnecessary friction for trusted payments and lowering operational noise.

The bank also gained a practical governance framework for maintaining these controls, giving it a stronger platform for ongoing fraud screening management and further enhancement.